Skip to content

AQA A-level Physics revision notes

Astrophysics (A-level only)

Section 3.9
Year 2
Year 2: this is content the exam board adds beyond the AS subject content, for the full A-level.
14 specification points
Optional · choose 1 of 5

Notes and three levels of exam-style practice for each registered specification point in this section.

Checked against AQA 7408 section 3.9

Checked against AQA 7408 section 3.9. Review basis: the qualification registry sourced from the AQA A-level Physics (7408) specification; registry verification recorded 11 July 2026.

How this checking works

In the exam: Data and formulae booklet provided · calculator allowed in every paper

Open the printable pack
3.9.1.1

Astronomical telescope consisting of two converging lenses

Notes
Evidence from your answers: none yet
Your confidence:

A self-report of how sure you feel. It does not measure mastery. Evidence from your answers reaches secure after the latest Tier 2/3 attempt is correct, with three correct distinct drills across at least two dates and two practice sources.

Explanation

  • An astronomical telescope in normal adjustment uses a long-focal-length converging objective and a short-focal-length converging eyepiece. Parallel rays from a distant object are focused by the objective to form a real, inverted intermediate image.
  • This image lies in the focal plane shared by the two lenses, so the eyepiece sends parallel rays to the relaxed eye and the final image is virtual at infinity.
  • The lens separation is therefore fo+fef_o+f_e.
  • Angular magnification compares the angle subtended at the eye through the telescope with that at the unaided eye; its magnitude is M=fo/feM=f_o/f_e.
  • A complete ray diagram must show the intermediate image, both focal points and parallel emergent rays.
Ray path through a two-converging-lens telescope in normal adjustment.
Worked example

A telescope in normal adjustment has fo=1.20mf_o=1.20\,\text{m} and fe=30.0mmf_e=30.0\,\text{mm}. Calculate its angular magnification and lens separation.

  1. 1.Convert the eyepiece focal length: fe=0.0300mf_e=0.0300\,\text{m}.
  2. 2.Use M=fo/fe=1.20/0.0300=40.0M=f_o/f_e=1.20/0.0300=40.0.
  3. 3.Use the normal-adjustment separation fo+fe=1.20+0.0300=1.23mf_o+f_e=1.20+0.0300=1.23\,\text{m}.

Answer: The angular magnification has magnitude 40.040.0 and the lens separation is 1.23m1.23\,\text{m}.

Common mistakes

  • Don't use image-height magnification instead of the ratio of angles subtended at the eye.
  • Don't subtract the focal lengths even though the objective and eyepiece focal planes coincide in normal adjustment.
  • Don't leave the emergent rays converging, which places the final image at a finite distance rather than at infinity.

Exam tip

For a ray-diagram question, label both lenses, the shared focal plane and the real inverted intermediate image before drawing the parallel emergent rays.

Tier 1 · Easy

ORIGINAL

An astronomical telescope in normal adjustment has objective focal length 1.20m1.20\,\text{m} and eyepiece focal length 30.0mm30.0\,\text{mm}. Calculate the magnitude of its angular magnification.

[1 mark]

Total for this question: 1

Evidence from answers you checked

Checked automatically against the model answer once you submit.

Tier 2 · Standard

ORIGINAL

A distant crater subtends 2.0×104rad2.0\times10^{-4}\,\text{rad} at the unaided eye. It is viewed through a normal-adjustment telescope with fo=1.500mf_o=1.500\,\text{m} and fe=25.0mmf_e=25.0\,\text{mm}. Determine the angle subtended at the eye and the lens separation.

[3 marks]

Total for this question: 3

Tier 3 · Hard

ORIGINAL

A telescope is to make an object that subtends 1.50×104rad1.50\times10^{-4}\,\text{rad} appear to subtend at least 4.80×103rad4.80\times10^{-3}\,\text{rad}. The objective focal length is 0.960m0.960\,\text{m}. Determine the greatest acceptable eyepiece focal length and the corresponding maximum telescope length in normal adjustment.

[5 marks]

Total for this question: 5

Your progress and exam materials

This section: Evidence from your answers: 0/14 secureYour confidence: 0 self-rated secureTracker status: 0/14 secure, 0 shaky, 14 unseen

Overall: Evidence from your answers: 0/147 secureYour confidence: 0 self-rated secureTracker status: 0/147 secure, 0 shaky, 147 unseen

Progress is saved on this device for guests and accounts right now; cross-device account sync is not live yet.

3.9.1.2

Reflecting telescopes

Notes
Evidence from your answers: none yet
Your confidence:

A self-report of how sure you feel. It does not measure mastery. Evidence from your answers reaches secure after the latest Tier 2/3 attempt is correct, with three correct distinct drills across at least two dates and two practice sources.

Explanation

  • A Cassegrain reflecting telescope uses a large parabolic concave primary mirror and a small convex secondary mirror.
  • Parallel incident rays reflect from the primary and begin to converge; before reaching the primary focus, they strike the secondary and are reflected back through a central hole in the primary towards the eyepiece.
  • A parabolic primary brings on-axis parallel rays to one focus, avoiding the spherical aberration produced by a spherical mirror.
  • Reflectors also avoid chromatic aberration because reflection does not depend on refractive index.
  • Compared with a large refracting objective, a mirror can be supported across its back and made with a larger practical aperture, although the secondary obstructs part of the incoming beam.
Cassegrain ray path from the parabolic primary to the convex secondary and eyepiece.
Worked example

Explain two reasons why a large Cassegrain reflector is usually preferred to a refractor of the same aperture.

  1. 1.Reflection does not separate wavelengths by refractive index, so the reflector has no chromatic aberration.
  2. 2.A parabolic primary focuses on-axis parallel rays together, avoiding the spherical aberration of a spherical surface.
  3. 3.The primary mirror can be supported across its back, whereas a large lens is supported at its edge and is more liable to distort.

Answer: The reflector controls both named aberrations and allows a mechanically practical large aperture.

Common mistakes

  • Don't draw the convex secondary as a lens and let the rays pass through it.
  • Don't claim that every mirror avoids spherical aberration; a spherical mirror still gives spherical aberration.
  • Don't state that a reflector has no disadvantages, ignoring the obstruction caused by the secondary mirror.

Exam tip

In a compare question, link each design feature to its consequence: parabolic surface to reduced spherical aberration, and reflection to no chromatic aberration.

Tier 1 · Easy

ORIGINAL

State one aberration that a reflecting telescope avoids because its primary element is a mirror rather than a lens.

[1 mark]

Total for this question: 1

Tier 2 · Standard

ORIGINAL

Describe the path of initially parallel rays through a Cassegrain reflecting telescope up to the eyepiece.

[3 marks]

Total for this question: 3

Tier 3 · Hard

ORIGINAL

A research group must choose between a large refracting telescope and a Cassegrain reflector of the same aperture. Discuss why the reflector is usually preferred, including aberrations and construction.

[5 marks]

Total for this question: 5

3.9.1.3

Single dish radio telescopes, I-R, U-V and X-ray telescopes

Notes
Evidence from your answers: none yet
Your confidence:

A self-report of how sure you feel. It does not measure mastery. Evidence from your answers reaches secure after the latest Tier 2/3 attempt is correct, with three correct distinct drills across at least two dates and two practice sources.

Explanation

  • A single-dish radio telescope resembles an optical reflector: a concave dish collects waves and directs them to a receiver near the focus, and its collecting power is proportional to D2D^2.
  • Radio wavelengths are much longer than visible wavelengths, so θλ/D\theta\approx\lambda/D means that a much larger dish is needed for comparable angular resolution.
  • Radio telescopes can operate through cloud and in daylight, but require sites with little human-made radio interference.
  • Infrared observations favour high, dry sites and cooled detectors because atmospheric water vapour and thermal radiation interfere.
  • Most ultraviolet and X-ray astronomy is performed above the atmosphere, usually on satellites, because those wavelengths are strongly absorbed before reaching the ground.
Worked example

An optical telescope of diameter 0.200m0.200\,\text{m} observes at 550nm550\,\text{nm}. Estimate the radio-dish diameter needed for the same angular resolution at 0.210m0.210\,\text{m}.

  1. 1.For equal resolution, set λopt/Dopt=λradio/Dradio\lambda_{\text{opt}}/D_{\text{opt}}=\lambda_{\text{radio}}/D_{\text{radio}}.
  2. 2.Rearrange to Dradio=Doptλradio/λoptD_{\text{radio}}=D_{\text{opt}}\lambda_{\text{radio}}/\lambda_{\text{opt}}.
  3. 3.Substitute to obtain Dradio=0.200(0.210)/(550×109)=7.64×104mD_{\text{radio}}=0.200(0.210)/(550\times10^{-9})=7.64\times10^4\,\text{m}.

Answer: The required diameter is approximately 7.64×104m7.64\times10^4\,\text{m}, showing why radio dishes need very large apertures.

Common mistakes

  • Don't claim that a radio dish has optical-telescope resolution at the same diameter despite its much longer wavelength.
  • Don't place an X-ray telescope at ground level even though the atmosphere absorbs astronomical X-rays.
  • Don't say that every non-visible telescope uses a glass objective lens.

Exam tip

A comparison must address structure, observing position, use, resolving power and collecting power rather than naming wavelength bands alone.

Tier 1 · Easy

ORIGINAL

State why most X-ray telescopes used for astronomy are placed on satellites.

[1 mark]

Total for this question: 1

Tier 2 · Standard

ORIGINAL

An optical telescope of diameter 0.200m0.200\,\text{m} observes at 550nm550\,\text{nm}. Estimate the diameter of a radio dish observing at 0.210m0.210\,\text{m} that would have the same Rayleigh angular resolution.

[3 marks]

Total for this question: 3

Tier 3 · Hard

ORIGINAL

Discuss suitable observing locations for radio, infrared, ultraviolet and X-ray astronomy, and explain why a radio dish generally has a much larger diameter than an optical telescope.

[6 marks]

Total for this question: 6

3.9.1.4

Advantages of large diameter telescopes

Notes
Evidence from your answers: none yet
Your confidence:

A self-report of how sure you feel. It does not measure mastery. Evidence from your answers reaches secure after the latest Tier 2/3 attempt is correct, with three correct distinct drills across at least two dates and two practice sources.

Explanation

  • A larger telescope diameter improves both resolution and sensitivity. The Rayleigh criterion gives the minimum angular separation as θλ/D\theta\approx\lambda/D, where θ\theta is in radians, so increasing DD allows two closer sources to be resolved at the same wavelength.
  • Collecting power is proportional to the aperture area and therefore to D2D^2, so a larger telescope detects fainter sources in a given exposure. A CCD has greater quantum efficiency than the eye: it detects a greater proportion of the incident photons.
  • It can also accumulate charge during a long exposure and gives a permanent digital record that is convenient to process.
  • Detector resolution depends on pixel size, while the telescope aperture still sets the diffraction limit.
  • No knowledge of CCD internal structure is required.
Worked example

A telescope diameter increases from 0.50m0.50\,\text{m} to 2.0m2.0\,\text{m} at the same wavelength. Compare its minimum resolvable angle and collecting power.

  1. 1.The diameter increases by a factor of 2.0/0.50=42.0/0.50=4.
  2. 2.Since θ1/D\theta\propto1/D, the minimum resolvable angle becomes one quarter as large.
  3. 3.Since collecting power is proportional to D2D^2, it increases by 42=164^2=16.

Answer: The minimum resolvable angle is quartered and the collecting power is multiplied by 1616.

Common mistakes

  • Don't state that collecting power is proportional to diameter instead of diameter squared.
  • Don't say that a larger minimum angular resolution is better; better resolution means a smaller resolvable angle.
  • Don't attribute unlimited resolution to smaller CCD pixels and ignore the aperture's diffraction limit.

Exam tip

For a diameter-ratio question, apply the ratio once to θD1\theta\propto D^{-1} and square it for collecting power.

Tier 1 · Easy

ORIGINAL

A telescope aperture is increased from 0.30m0.30\,\text{m} to 0.60m0.60\,\text{m}. Determine the factor by which its collecting power increases.

[1 mark]

Total for this question: 1

Evidence from answers you checked

Checked automatically against the model answer once you submit.

Tier 2 · Standard

ORIGINAL

Calculate the Rayleigh minimum angular resolution of a 2.50m2.50\,\text{m} telescope at wavelength 500nm500\,\text{nm}. State the effect of increasing the diameter.

[3 marks]

Total for this question: 3

Tier 3 · Hard

ORIGINAL

Two telescopes have diameters 4.00m4.00\,\text{m} and 10.0m10.0\,\text{m} and observe at 600nm600\,\text{nm}. A pair of faint stars is separated by 8.0×108rad8.0\times10^{-8}\,\text{rad}. Determine which telescope can resolve the pair, compare their collecting powers, and explain one advantage of recording with a CCD rather than the eye.

[6 marks]

Total for this question: 6

3.9.2.1

Classification by luminosity

Notes
Evidence from your answers: none yet
Your confidence:

A self-report of how sure you feel. It does not measure mastery. Evidence from your answers reaches secure after the latest Tier 2/3 attempt is correct, with three correct distinct drills across at least two dates and two practice sources.

Explanation

  • Apparent magnitude mm describes how bright a star appears from Earth on the Hipparcos scale. The order is reversed: a smaller or more negative magnitude means a brighter object, while the dimmest stars visible to the unaided eye have m+6m\approx+6.
  • The scale is logarithmic and subjective.
  • A difference of one magnitude corresponds to an intensity ratio of 2.512.51, so a magnitude difference Δm\Delta m corresponds to an intensity ratio 2.51Δm2.51^{\lvert\Delta m\rvert}, with the lower-magnitude object being more intense.
  • Apparent magnitude alone does not give luminosity because distance changes the detected intensity.
  • Examiners expect the direction of the comparison as well as the calculated ratio.
Worked example

Star A has apparent magnitude 1.01.0 and star B has apparent magnitude 6.06.0. Calculate how many times brighter A appears than B.

  1. 1.The magnitude difference is 6.01.0=5.06.0-1.0=5.0.
  2. 2.Use the intensity ratio 2.515=99.72.51^5=99.7.
  3. 3.Star A has the lower apparent magnitude, so A is the brighter star.

Answer: Star A appears approximately 100100 times brighter than star B.

Common mistakes

  • Don't call the magnitude-66 star brighter because 66 is numerically greater than 11.
  • Don't multiply the magnitude difference by 2.512.51 instead of raising 2.512.51 to that difference.
  • Don't treat apparent magnitude as a direct measure of the star's intrinsic luminosity.

Exam tip

After finding an intensity ratio, state explicitly that the object with the lower apparent magnitude appears brighter.

Tier 1 · Easy

ORIGINAL

Two stars have apparent magnitudes +1.0+1.0 and +4.0+4.0. State which appears brighter.

[1 mark]

Total for this question: 1

Tier 2 · Standard

ORIGINAL

Star P has apparent magnitude 2.002.00 and star Q has apparent magnitude 5.005.00. Calculate the ratio IP/IQI_P/I_Q.

[3 marks]

Total for this question: 3

Tier 3 · Hard

ORIGINAL

Interstellar dust reduces the received intensity from a star by a factor of 20.020.0. Before the dimming, its apparent magnitude was 2.002.00. Determine its new apparent magnitude and whether it should remain visible to the unaided eye under dark conditions.

[5 marks]

Total for this question: 5

3.9.2.2

Absolute magnitude, M

Notes
Evidence from your answers: none yet
Your confidence:

A self-report of how sure you feel. It does not measure mastery. Evidence from your answers reaches secure after the latest Tier 2/3 attempt is correct, with three correct distinct drills across at least two dates and two practice sources.

Explanation

  • Absolute magnitude MM is the apparent magnitude a star would have if placed 10pc10\,\text{pc} from Earth, so it permits intrinsic luminosities to be compared without the effect of differing distances. The distance modulus is mM=5log10(d/10)m-M=5\log_{10}(d/10), where dd must be in parsecs.
  • A more negative value of MM represents a more luminous star.
  • One parsec is approximately 3.263.26 light years; both are units of distance, although a light year is defined using the distance light travels in one year.
  • In calculations, the logarithm is base ten and the distance must not be entered in metres.
  • A valid conclusion distinguishes apparent brightness mm from intrinsic brightness MM.
Worked example

A star has apparent magnitude m=7.5m=7.5 and is 100pc100\,\text{pc} away. Calculate its absolute magnitude.

  1. 1.Use mM=5log10(d/10)m-M=5\log_{10}(d/10).
  2. 2.Substitute d=100pcd=100\,\text{pc}: 7.5M=5log10(10)=57.5-M=5\log_{10}(10)=5.
  3. 3.Rearrange to M=7.55=2.5M=7.5-5=2.5.

Answer: The star's absolute magnitude is M=+2.5M=+2.5.

Common mistakes

  • Don't substitute distance in metres into a relation that requires parsecs.
  • Don't use a natural logarithm instead of log10\log_{10}.
  • Don't say that a more positive absolute magnitude means a greater intrinsic luminosity.

Exam tip

Write the distance modulus with d/10d/10 before substitution; this makes both the parsec unit and the sign of MM easier to track.

Tier 1 · Easy

ORIGINAL

A star is exactly 10pc10\,\text{pc} from Earth and has apparent magnitude 4.34.3. State its absolute magnitude.

[1 mark]

Total for this question: 1

Tier 2 · Standard

ORIGINAL

A star has apparent magnitude 8.48.4 and absolute magnitude 3.43.4. Calculate its distance from Earth in parsecs.

[3 marks]

Total for this question: 3

Tier 3 · Hard

ORIGINAL

A supergiant has apparent magnitude 12.012.0 and absolute magnitude 1.0-1.0. Determine its distance in parsecs and in light years. Use 1pc=3.26ly1\,\text{pc}=3.26\,\text{ly}.

[5 marks]

Total for this question: 5

3.9.2.3

Classification by temperature, black-body radiation

Notes
Evidence from your answers: none yet
Your confidence:

A self-report of how sure you feel. It does not measure mastery. Evidence from your answers reaches secure after the latest Tier 2/3 attempt is correct, with three correct distinct drills across at least two dates and two practice sources.

Explanation

  • A star may be modelled as a black body. Its continuous spectrum has a single peak; increasing temperature moves the peak to shorter wavelength and increases the area under the curve.
  • Wien's displacement law, λmaxT=2.9×103m K\lambda_{\max}T=2.9\times10^{-3}\,\text{m K}, estimates surface temperature from the peak wavelength. Stefan's law is P=σAT4P=\sigma AT^4 and, for a spherical star, A=4πR2A=4\pi R^2, so PR2T4P\propto R^2T^4.
  • Received intensity follows I=P/(4πd2)I=P/(4\pi d^2) when emission is isotropic and absorption is negligible.
  • Calculations require wavelength in metres and temperature in kelvin.
  • Comparisons should state which quantities, such as radius or distance, are held constant.
Black-body curves showing the higher, shorter-wavelength peak of the hotter star.
Worked example

A star's spectrum peaks at 480nm480\,\text{nm}. Estimate its surface temperature.

  1. 1.Convert the peak wavelength: 480nm=4.80×107m480\,\text{nm}=4.80\times10^{-7}\,\text{m}.
  2. 2.Rearrange Wien's law to T=(2.9×103)/λmaxT=(2.9\times10^{-3})/\lambda_{\max}.
  3. 3.Substitute to obtain T=(2.9×103)/(4.80×107)=6.04×103KT=(2.9\times10^{-3})/(4.80\times10^{-7})=6.04\times10^3\,\text{K}.

Answer: The estimated surface temperature is 6.0×103K6.0\times10^3\,\text{K}.

Common mistakes

  • Don't substitute a wavelength in nanometres without converting it to metres.
  • Don't use degrees Celsius in Stefan's law or Wien's law instead of kelvin.
  • Don't draw the hotter black-body curve with a longer peak wavelength.

Exam tip

On a sketch, show both required changes for higher temperature: the peak moves left and the total area increases.

Tier 1 · Easy

ORIGINAL

The black-body spectrum of a star peaks at 580nm580\,\text{nm}. Estimate its surface temperature using Wien's law.

[2 marks]

Total for this question: 2

Tier 2 · Standard

ORIGINAL

Star B has twice the radius of star A but 0.8000.800 times its surface temperature. Using Stefan's law, calculate PB/PAP_B/P_A.

[3 marks]

Total for this question: 3

Tier 3 · Hard

ORIGINAL

A star 50.0pc50.0\,\text{pc} away produces an intensity of 3.20×1010W m23.20\times10^{-10}\,\text{W m}^{-2} at Earth and has peak wavelength 480nm480\,\text{nm}. Assuming isotropic emission and black-body behaviour, determine its surface temperature and radius. Use 1pc=3.086×1016m1\,\text{pc}=3.086\times10^{16}\,\text{m} and σ=5.67×108W m2K4\sigma=5.67\times10^{-8}\,\text{W m}^{-2}\text{K}^{-4}.

[6 marks]

Total for this question: 6

3.9.2.4

Principles of the use of stellar spectral classes

Notes
Evidence from your answers: none yet
Your confidence:

A self-report of how sure you feel. It does not measure mastery. Evidence from your answers reaches secure after the latest Tier 2/3 attempt is correct, with three correct distinct drills across at least two dates and two practice sources.

Explanation

  • The spectral sequence OBAFGKM runs from hottest to coolest.
  • O and B stars are blue, A stars blue-white, F white, G yellow-white, K orange and M red.
  • Prominent lines also change: O spectra show ionised helium, helium and hydrogen; B show helium and hydrogen; A have the strongest hydrogen Balmer lines and ionised metals; F show ionised metals; G show ionised and neutral metals; K show neutral metals; M show neutral atoms and TiO.
  • Balmer absorption requires hydrogen atoms already in the n=2n=2 state.
  • Cooler stars have too few atoms excited to n=2n=2, while hotter stars have much hydrogen ionised, so Balmer lines are strongest near class A rather than in the hottest stars.
Worked example

A star has a surface temperature of 5800K5800\,\text{K} and shows ionised and neutral metal absorption lines. Identify its spectral class and intrinsic colour.

  1. 1.A temperature between 5000K5000\,\text{K} and 6000K6000\,\text{K} corresponds to class G.
  2. 2.Ionised and neutral metal lines are consistent with class G.
  3. 3.Class G stars have a yellow-white intrinsic colour.

Answer: The star is class G and is intrinsically yellow-white.

Common mistakes

  • Don't write OBAFGKM from coolest to hottest rather than hottest to coolest.
  • Don't infer that weak Balmer lines mean little hydrogen is present, ignoring excitation and ionisation.
  • Don't call a class M star blue even though M is the coolest, red class.

Exam tip

For an identification question, use both the temperature range and the prominent absorption lines before stating the spectral class.

Tier 1 · Easy

ORIGINAL

Three stars have spectral classes B, G and M. State which has the highest surface temperature.

[1 mark]

Total for this question: 1

Tier 2 · Standard

ORIGINAL

A star's continuous spectrum peaks at 410nm410\,\text{nm}. Estimate its temperature and hence identify its most likely spectral class. Use Wien's constant 2.9×103m K2.9\times10^{-3}\,\text{m K}.

[3 marks]

Total for this question: 3

Tier 3 · Hard

ORIGINAL

Explain why hydrogen Balmer absorption lines can be weak in both a very hot class O star and a cool class M star but strongest in a class A star.

[5 marks]

Total for this question: 5

3.9.2.5

The Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram

Notes
Evidence from your answers: none yet
Your confidence:

A self-report of how sure you feel. It does not measure mastery. Evidence from your answers reaches secure after the latest Tier 2/3 attempt is correct, with three correct distinct drills across at least two dates and two practice sources.

Explanation

  • A Hertzsprung-Russell diagram plots absolute magnitude vertically from about 10-10 at the top to +15+15 at the bottom, against surface temperature decreasing from about 50000K50000\,\text{K} on the left to 2500K2500\,\text{K} on the right; spectral classes OBAFGKM may replace temperature.
  • The main sequence runs diagonally from hot, luminous stars at upper left to cool, faint stars at lower right.
  • Giants occupy the upper-right region, while white dwarfs are hot but faint and lie at lower left.
  • The Sun is a class G main-sequence star at about 5800K5800\,\text{K} and M+5M\approx+5.
  • A Sun-like star progresses from formation to main sequence, red giant and finally white dwarf.
Schematic HR diagram with the main sequence, giants, white dwarfs and a Sun-like evolution path.
Worked example

A star has surface temperature 12000K12000\,\text{K} and absolute magnitude +12+12. Identify its likely region on an HR diagram.

  1. 1.12000K12000\,\text{K} places the star on the hot, left-hand side.
  2. 2.M=+12M=+12 makes it intrinsically faint and therefore low on the diagram.
  3. 3.The hot but faint lower-left region contains white dwarfs.

Answer: The star is likely to be a white dwarf.

Common mistakes

  • Don't draw temperature increasing from left to right instead of decreasing.
  • Don't place white dwarfs in the cool, faint lower-right region rather than the hot, faint lower-left region.
  • Don't plot apparent magnitude on the vertical axis instead of absolute magnitude.

Exam tip

Before locating a star, mark that hotter is left and more luminous, more negative absolute magnitude is higher.

Tier 1 · Easy

ORIGINAL

State the region of an HR diagram occupied by the Sun and give its approximate spectral class.

[2 marks]

Total for this question: 2

Tier 2 · Standard

ORIGINAL

A star has surface temperature 12000K12000\,\text{K} and absolute magnitude +12+12. Deduce its region on an HR diagram and justify your answer.

[3 marks]

Total for this question: 3

Tier 3 · Hard

ORIGINAL

A star is observed at two stages. Its absolute magnitude changes from +2.40+2.40 to +1.20+1.20 while its surface temperature falls from 7.20×103K7.20\times10^3\,\text{K} to 6.48×103K6.48\times10^3\,\text{K}. Determine the luminosity ratio L2/L1L_2/L_1. Test whether the observations are consistent with constant radius, then describe the star's motion on an HR diagram.

[5 marks]

Total for this question: 5

3.9.2.6

Supernovae, neutron stars and black holes

Notes
Evidence from your answers: none yet
Your confidence:

A self-report of how sure you feel. It does not measure mastery. Evidence from your answers reaches secure after the latest Tier 2/3 attempt is correct, with three correct distinct drills across at least two dates and two practice sources.

Explanation

  • A supernova shows a rapid increase in luminosity and a slower decline. Type Ia supernovae have standardisable peak absolute magnitudes, so comparing their known luminosity with observed brightness gives distance; their light curves helped reveal an accelerating Universe, interpreted using dark energy.
  • A neutron star is an extremely dense compact remnant composed mainly of neutrons.
  • Collapse of a supergiant to a neutron star or black hole can produce a gamma-ray burst whose brief energy output is comparable with the Sun's total output over a very long time.
  • For a black hole, escape velocity exceeds cc within the event horizon and Rs2GM/c2R_s\approx2GM/c^2.
  • Supermassive black holes occur at galactic centres.
Typical type Ia supernova light curve with a rapid rise and slower decline.
Worked example

Calculate the Schwarzschild radius of a black hole of mass 8.0×1030kg8.0\times10^{30}\,\text{kg}. Use G=6.67×1011N m2kg2G=6.67\times10^{-11}\,\text{N m}^2\text{kg}^{-2} and c=3.00×108m s1c=3.00\times10^8\,\text{m s}^{-1}.

  1. 1.Use Rs=2GM/c2R_s=2GM/c^2.
  2. 2.Substitute Rs=2(6.67×1011)(8.0×1030)/(3.00×108)2R_s=2(6.67\times10^{-11})(8.0\times10^{30})/(3.00\times10^8)^2.
  3. 3.Evaluate to obtain Rs=1.19×104mR_s=1.19\times10^4\,\text{m}.

Answer: The Schwarzschild radius is 1.2×104m1.2\times10^4\,\text{m}.

Common mistakes

  • Don't use GM/c2GM/c^2 and omit the factor of two in the Schwarzschild radius.
  • Don't describe a neutron star as being composed mainly of protons rather than neutrons.
  • Don't call a type Ia supernova a standard candle without linking its known peak luminosity to distance.

Exam tip

In an explanation of cosmic acceleration, separate the distance evidence from the dark-energy interpretation.

Tier 1 · Easy

ORIGINAL

A newly identified black hole has mass 5.20×1030kg5.20\times10^{30}\,\text{kg}. Determine its event-horizon radius using G=6.67×1011N m2kg2G=6.67\times10^{-11}\,\text{N m}^2\text{kg}^{-2} and c=3.00×108m s1c=3.00\times10^8\,\text{m s}^{-1}.

[2 marks]

Total for this question: 2

Tier 2 · Standard

ORIGINAL

A type Ia supernova has absolute magnitude 19.5-19.5 and peak apparent magnitude 18.518.5. Use the distance modulus to estimate its distance in parsecs.

[4 marks]

Total for this question: 4

Tier 3 · Hard

ORIGINAL

The collapse of a supergiant produces a gamma-ray burst of energy 4.0×1044J4.0\times10^{44}\,\text{J} and leaves a compact object of mass 6.0×1030kg6.0\times10^{30}\,\text{kg}. Calculate the object's Schwarzschild radius and the time for the Sun, at constant power 3.8×1026W3.8\times10^{26}\,\text{W}, to emit the burst energy. Give the time in years and use G=6.67×1011N m2kg2G=6.67\times10^{-11}\,\text{N m}^2\text{kg}^{-2}, c=3.00×108m s1c=3.00\times10^8\,\text{m s}^{-1} and 1year=3.156×107s1\,\text{year}=3.156\times10^7\,\text{s}.

[6 marks]

Total for this question: 6

3.9.3.1

Doppler effect

Notes
Evidence from your answers: none yet
Your confidence:

A self-report of how sure you feel. It does not measure mastery. Evidence from your answers reaches secure after the latest Tier 2/3 attempt is correct, with three correct distinct drills across at least two dates and two practice sources.

Explanation

  • Relative motion along the line of sight changes observed wavelength and frequency. For speeds much smaller than cc, Δf/f=v/c\Delta f/f=-v/c and the redshift z=Δλ/λ=v/cz=\Delta\lambda/\lambda=v/c, with positive vv for recession.
  • A receding source has a lower observed frequency and longer wavelength; an approaching source has a higher frequency and shorter wavelength.
  • The denominator is the unshifted laboratory frequency or wavelength.
  • In a binary system viewed in the plane of its orbit, each star alternately approaches and recedes, so its spectral lines shift periodically between blue and red.
  • Calculations must confirm that vcv\ll c before relying on the non-relativistic approximation.
Periodic blue and red shifts from a binary system viewed in the plane of its orbit.
Worked example

A line of laboratory wavelength 500.00nm500.00\,\text{nm} is observed at 500.40nm500.40\,\text{nm}. Calculate zz and the radial speed using c=3.00×108m s1c=3.00\times10^8\,\text{m s}^{-1}.

  1. 1.Find Δλ=500.40500.00=0.40nm\Delta\lambda=500.40-500.00=0.40\,\text{nm}.
  2. 2.Calculate z=Δλ/λ=0.40/500.00=8.0×104z=\Delta\lambda/\lambda=0.40/500.00=8.0\times10^{-4}.
  3. 3.Use v=zc=(8.0×104)(3.00×108)=2.4×105m s1v=zc=(8.0\times10^{-4})(3.00\times10^8)=2.4\times10^5\,\text{m s}^{-1}.

Answer: The redshift is 8.0×1048.0\times10^{-4} and the source is receding at 2.4×105m s12.4\times10^5\,\text{m s}^{-1}; v/c=8.0×1041v/c=8.0\times10^{-4}\ll1.

Common mistakes

  • Don't use the observed wavelength rather than the unshifted laboratory wavelength in the denominator.
  • Don't associate a longer observed wavelength with an approaching source instead of a receding source.
  • Don't apply v=zcv=zc to a large redshift without checking the condition vcv\ll c.

Exam tip

State both direction and speed: the sign of the shift identifies approach or recession, while its magnitude gives vv.

Tier 1 · Easy

ORIGINAL

A spectral line of laboratory wavelength 500.00nm500.00\,\text{nm} is observed at 500.40nm500.40\,\text{nm}. Calculate the redshift zz.

[2 marks]

Total for this question: 2

Tier 2 · Standard

ORIGINAL

Radiation emitted at 1.42000GHz1.42000\,\text{GHz} is received from a gas cloud at 1.41900GHz1.41900\,\text{GHz}. Determine the cloud's radial speed and state whether it is approaching or receding. Use c=3.00×108m s1c=3.00\times10^8\,\text{m s}^{-1}.

[3 marks]

Total for this question: 3

Tier 3 · Hard

ORIGINAL

In an equal-mass binary system viewed in the plane of its circular orbit, a line of rest wavelength 656.300nm656.300\,\text{nm} alternates between 656.000nm656.000\,\text{nm} and 656.600nm656.600\,\text{nm} for one star. The orbital period is 8.00days8.00\,\text{days}. Estimate the speed of that star, its orbital radius about the centre of mass, and the separation of the stars. Use c=3.00×108m s1c=3.00\times10^8\,\text{m s}^{-1}.

[6 marks]

Total for this question: 6

3.9.3.2

Hubble's law

Notes
Evidence from your answers: none yet
Your confidence:

A self-report of how sure you feel. It does not measure mastery. Evidence from your answers reaches secure after the latest Tier 2/3 attempt is correct, with three correct distinct drills across at least two dates and two practice sources.

Explanation

  • Hubble's law, v=Hdv=Hd, states that a distant galaxy's recession speed is proportional to its distance.
  • A straight-line graph of vv against dd has gradient HH, supporting the interpretation that space is expanding rather than that galaxies left one central point through fixed space.
  • If HH is assumed constant, extrapolation gives an age estimate t1/Ht\approx1/H; HH must first be converted from km s1Mpc1\text{km s}^{-1}\text{Mpc}^{-1} to s1\text{s}^{-1}.
  • Big Bang evidence also includes cosmological microwave background radiation, interpreted as cooled relic radiation, and the relative abundance of hydrogen and helium produced in the early Universe.
  • The constant-HH age is an estimate, not an exact expansion history.
Hubble plot in which the gradient of recession speed against distance is the Hubble constant.
Worked example

Estimate the age of the Universe for H=68.0km s1Mpc1H=68.0\,\text{km s}^{-1}\text{Mpc}^{-1}. Use 1Mpc=3.086×1022m1\,\text{Mpc}=3.086\times10^{22}\,\text{m} and 1year=3.156×107s1\,\text{year}=3.156\times10^7\,\text{s}.

  1. 1.Convert H=(68.0×103)/(3.086×1022)=2.20×1018s1H=(68.0\times10^3)/(3.086\times10^{22})=2.20\times10^{-18}\,\text{s}^{-1}.
  2. 2.Use t1/H=4.54×1017st\approx1/H=4.54\times10^{17}\,\text{s}.
  3. 3.Convert to years: t=(4.54×1017)/(3.156×107)=1.44×1010yearst=(4.54\times10^{17})/(3.156\times10^7)=1.44\times10^{10}\,\text{years}.

Answer: The estimated age is 1.44×1010years1.44\times10^{10}\,\text{years}, assuming HH has remained constant.

Common mistakes

  • Don't take the reciprocal of HH while it is still in km s1Mpc1\text{km s}^{-1}\text{Mpc}^{-1}.
  • Don't call the constant-HH result an exact age despite the assumption about expansion history.
  • Don't describe the cosmological microwave background as radiation emitted by present-day stars.

Exam tip

For an age estimate, show the conversion of HH to s1\text{s}^{-1} before using t1/Ht\approx1/H.

Tier 1 · Easy

ORIGINAL

Use H=70km s1Mpc1H=70\,\text{km s}^{-1}\text{Mpc}^{-1} to calculate the recession speed of a galaxy 120Mpc120\,\text{Mpc} away.

[1 mark]

Total for this question: 1

Tier 2 · Standard

ORIGINAL

Estimate the age of the Universe for H=68.0km s1Mpc1H=68.0\,\text{km s}^{-1}\text{Mpc}^{-1}. Assume HH is constant and use 1Mpc=3.086×1022m1\,\text{Mpc}=3.086\times10^{22}\,\text{m} and 1year=3.156×107s1\,\text{year}=3.156\times10^7\,\text{s}.

[4 marks]

Total for this question: 4

Tier 3 · Hard

ORIGINAL

A galaxy's hydrogen line has laboratory wavelength 486.10nm486.10\,\text{nm} and is observed at 493.40nm493.40\,\text{nm}. Use the non-relativistic Doppler approximation and H=70.0km s1Mpc1H=70.0\,\text{km s}^{-1}\text{Mpc}^{-1} to estimate the galaxy's distance. Check whether vcv\ll c, taking c=3.00×105km s1c=3.00\times10^5\,\text{km s}^{-1}.

[6 marks]

Total for this question: 6

3.9.3.3

Quasars

Notes
Evidence from your answers: none yet
Your confidence:

A self-report of how sure you feel. It does not measure mastery. Evidence from your answers reaches secure after the latest Tier 2/3 attempt is correct, with three correct distinct drills across at least two dates and two practice sources.

Explanation

  • Quasars were first identified as unusually bright radio sources. Their spectra show large optical redshifts, placing them among the most distant measurable objects, yet their received flux can still be substantial.
  • This combination implies an enormous power output. A quasar is an active galactic nucleus powered by matter accreting onto a supermassive black hole, where gravitational energy is converted into radiation.
  • For a sufficiently small redshift, $v\approx zc$ and Hubble's law gives d=v/Hd=v/H.
  • If emission is assumed isotropic, the luminosity follows P=4πd2FP=4\pi d^2F.
  • These estimates require explicit low-redshift, isotropic-emission and inverse-square assumptions; observed flux is not the same quantity as emitted power.
Worked example

A quasar is 900Mpc900\,\text{Mpc} away and produces flux 2.5×1015W m22.5\times10^{-15}\,\text{W m}^{-2} at Earth. Estimate its power, assuming isotropic emission and 1Mpc=3.086×1022m1\,\text{Mpc}=3.086\times10^{22}\,\text{m}.

  1. 1.Convert the distance: d=900(3.086×1022)=2.777×1025md=900(3.086\times10^{22})=2.777\times10^{25}\,\text{m}.
  2. 2.Use the inverse-square relation P=4πd2FP=4\pi d^2F.
  3. 3.Substitute to obtain P=4π(2.777×1025)2(2.5×1015)=2.42×1037WP=4\pi(2.777\times10^{25})^2(2.5\times10^{-15})=2.42\times10^{37}\,\text{W}.

Answer: The estimated quasar power is 2.4×1037W2.4\times10^{37}\,\text{W}.

Common mistakes

  • Don't equate the measured flux in W m2\text{W m}^{-2} directly with the quasar's power in watts.
  • Don't describe a quasar as an exceptionally bright ordinary star rather than an active galactic nucleus.
  • Don't use v=zcv=zc for a large optical redshift without qualifying the non-relativistic approximation.

Exam tip

An estimation answer should name the assumptions alongside the result, especially isotropic emission and the validity of the low-redshift approximation.

Tier 1 · Easy

ORIGINAL

State the central engine believed to power a quasar.

[1 mark]

Total for this question: 1

Tier 2 · Standard

ORIGINAL

A quasar at distance 900Mpc900\,\text{Mpc} produces a flux of 2.5×1015W m22.5\times10^{-15}\,\text{W m}^{-2} at Earth. Estimate its power output assuming isotropic emission. Use 1Mpc=3.086×1022m1\,\text{Mpc}=3.086\times10^{22}\,\text{m}.

[3 marks]

Total for this question: 3

Tier 3 · Hard

ORIGINAL

A low-redshift quasar has z=0.0200z=0.0200 and measured flux 1.60×1013W m21.60\times10^{-13}\,\text{W m}^{-2}. Estimate its distance, power output and power in units of the Sun's luminosity. Use c=3.00×105km s1c=3.00\times10^5\,\text{km s}^{-1}, H=70.0km s1Mpc1H=70.0\,\text{km s}^{-1}\text{Mpc}^{-1}, 1Mpc=3.086×1022m1\,\text{Mpc}=3.086\times10^{22}\,\text{m} and L=3.83×1026WL_{\odot}=3.83\times10^{26}\,\text{W}. Assume isotropic emission.

[6 marks]

Total for this question: 6

3.9.3.4

Detection of exoplanets

Notes
Evidence from your answers: none yet
Your confidence:

A self-report of how sure you feel. It does not measure mastery. Evidence from your answers reaches secure after the latest Tier 2/3 attempt is correct, with three correct distinct drills across at least two dates and two practice sources.

Explanation

  • Direct exoplanet detection is difficult because a planet is much fainter than its host star and the angular separation is very small. The radial-velocity method detects periodic red and blue Doppler shifts in the star's absorption lines as the star orbits the system's centre of mass; it measures only line-of-sight motion.
  • The transit method detects a repeated fall in brightness when an aligned planet crosses the stellar disc.
  • A typical light curve has a steady baseline, ingress, a low region and egress, repeated once per orbital period.
  • Approximately, transit depth satisfies ΔI/I=(Rp/R)2\Delta I/I=(R_p/R_*)^2.
  • Matching periods from both methods provide stronger evidence, while a missing transit does not rule out a planet because alignment may be unsuitable.
Typical exoplanet transit light curve with ingress, minimum intensity and egress.
Worked example

A transit reduces a star's intensity by 0.810%0.810\%. Estimate the planet radius if the star radius is 6.90×108m6.90\times10^8\,\text{m}.

  1. 1.Convert the percentage to a fraction: 0.810%=0.008100.810\%=0.00810.
  2. 2.Use Rp=RΔI/IR_p=R_*\sqrt{\Delta I/I}.
  3. 3.Substitute Rp=(6.90×108)0.00810=6.21×107mR_p=(6.90\times10^8)\sqrt{0.00810}=6.21\times10^7\,\text{m}.

Answer: The planet radius is approximately 6.21×107m6.21\times10^7\,\text{m}.

Common mistakes

  • Don't use the percentage value 0.8100.810 as a fraction instead of converting it to 0.008100.00810.
  • Don't assume that every exoplanet produces a transit even when the orbital plane is not suitably aligned.
  • Don't attribute the periodic Doppler shift to motion of the planet's spectrum rather than the host star's spectrum.

Exam tip

When interpreting a light curve, identify repeated equal-period dips and distinguish transit depth from transit duration.

Tier 1 · Easy

ORIGINAL

A star's brightness shows equal, regularly repeated dips. Name the exoplanet-detection method indicated by this observation.

[1 mark]

Total for this question: 1

Tier 2 · Standard

ORIGINAL

During a transit, a star's detected intensity falls by 0.810%0.810\%. Estimate the radius of the planet if the star's radius is 6.90×108m6.90\times10^8\,\text{m}.

[3 marks]

Total for this question: 3

Tier 3 · Hard

ORIGINAL

A star has radius 8.0×108m8.0\times10^8\,\text{m}. Every 5.2days5.2\,\text{days} its intensity falls by 0.160%0.160\%, while a 600.0nm600.0\,\text{nm} absorption line shifts with the same period by up to 0.014nm0.014\,\text{nm} to either side of its mean. Calculate the planet's radius and the star's maximum radial speed, then explain why the combined observations are stronger evidence for an exoplanet than either observation alone. Use c=3.00×108m s1c=3.00\times10^8\,\text{m s}^{-1}.

[6 marks]

Total for this question: 6

Want help turning these notes into marks?

Bring a tricky specification point or a recent answer, and we can work through the method and exam wording together.