1.
(3)
(Total for Question 1 is 3 marks)
5 specification points · notes, questions, answers and worked methods
Checked against Edexcel 9FM0 section FP1-2. Review basis: the qualification registry sourced from the Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Further Mathematics (9FM0) specification; registry verification recorded 17 July 2026.
Explanation
Worked example
Find the Taylor expansion of in ascending powers of as far as the term in .
Answer:
Common mistakes
Exam tip
Set out a two-column table of derivatives and their values at before writing a single term of the series; the marks follow the table.
1.
(3)
(Total for Question 1 is 3 marks)
2.
(4)
(Total for Question 2 is 4 marks)
1.
(4)
(Total for Question 1 is 4 marks)
2.
(4)
(Total for Question 2 is 4 marks)
3.
(5)
(Total for Question 3 is 5 marks)
1.
(6)
(Total for Question 1 is 6 marks)
2.
(6)
(Total for Question 2 is 6 marks)
3.
(5)
(Total for Question 3 is 5 marks)
4.
(6)
(Total for Question 4 is 6 marks)
5.
(6)
(Total for Question 5 is 6 marks)
Explanation
Worked example
Use series expansions to evaluate .
Answer: The limit is .
Common mistakes
Exam tip
Look at the denominator first: its degree tells you exactly how many terms of every numerator expansion you must keep.
1.
(3)
(Total for Question 1 is 3 marks)
2.
(3)
(Total for Question 2 is 3 marks)
1.
(3)
(Total for Question 1 is 3 marks)
2.
(4)
(Total for Question 2 is 4 marks)
3.
(4)
(Total for Question 3 is 4 marks)
1.
(5)
(Total for Question 1 is 5 marks)
2.
(6)
(Total for Question 2 is 6 marks)
3.
(6)
(Total for Question 3 is 6 marks)
4.
(6)
(Total for Question 4 is 6 marks)
5.
(6)
(Total for Question 5 is 6 marks)
Explanation
Worked example
Use Leibnitz's theorem to find the third derivative of .
Answer: .
Common mistakes
Exam tip
Write the sum out with its binomial coefficients before substituting anything; getting the Leibnitz structure down first makes the algebra that follows routine.
1.
(3)
(Total for Question 1 is 3 marks)
2.
(4)
(Total for Question 2 is 4 marks)
1.
(4)
(Total for Question 1 is 4 marks)
2.
(5)
(Total for Question 2 is 5 marks)
3.
(5)
(Total for Question 3 is 5 marks)
1.
(5)
(Total for Question 1 is 5 marks)
2.
(6)
(Total for Question 2 is 6 marks)
3.
(6)
(Total for Question 3 is 6 marks)
4.
(6)
(Total for Question 4 is 6 marks)
5.
(6)
(Total for Question 5 is 6 marks)
Explanation
Worked example
Evaluate .
Answer: The limit is .
Common mistakes
Exam tip
Before you differentiate, make sure the expression is a quotient in indeterminate form — for a product or difference, the first method mark is for rewriting it as with or (June 2022 9FM0/3A Q8(ii), M1). Annotating '' on later lines earns no mark of its own, but it stops the classic over-application error.
1.
(3)
(Total for Question 1 is 3 marks)
2.
(3)
(Total for Question 2 is 3 marks)
1.
(4)
(Total for Question 1 is 4 marks)
2.
(4)
(Total for Question 2 is 4 marks)
3.
(5)
(Total for Question 3 is 5 marks)
1.
(5)
(Total for Question 1 is 5 marks)
2.
(5)
(Total for Question 2 is 5 marks)
3.
(5)
(Total for Question 3 is 5 marks)
4.
(6)
(Total for Question 4 is 6 marks)
5.
(4)
(Total for Question 5 is 4 marks)
Explanation
Worked example
Use the substitution to find .
Answer: .
Common mistakes
Exam tip
Write the three substitution formulae and at the top of your working; every mark in these questions flows from getting that right.
1.
(4)
(Total for Question 1 is 4 marks)
2.
(4)
(Total for Question 2 is 4 marks)
1.
(5)
(Total for Question 1 is 5 marks)
2.
(5)
(Total for Question 2 is 5 marks)
3.
(5)
(Total for Question 3 is 5 marks)
1.
(6)
(Total for Question 1 is 6 marks)
2.
(6)
(Total for Question 2 is 6 marks)
3.
(6)
(Total for Question 3 is 6 marks)
4.
(6)
(Total for Question 4 is 6 marks)
5.
(5)
(Total for Question 5 is 5 marks)
Answers begin on a new printed page so the question pack can be completed without the solutions alongside it.
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| (3 marks) | 3 | |
| Notes | ||
| Every derivative of is , so each value at is and the coefficients are . Independent check: , which is the same series. | ||
| 2 |
| 4 |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| With , and , the values at are , and , so the coefficients are , and . Independent check: substituting into the standard expansion gives the same result. | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 4 |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| Here and , so the values at are , and , and the quadratic coefficient is . Independent check by the compound-angle route: , matching term by term. | ||
| 2 |
| 4 |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| Differentiating, and , giving and at ; the quadratic coefficient is . Independent check: . | ||
| 3 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| Repeated differentiation gives and , with the odd derivatives vanishing because is even; the coefficients are and . Independent check by substitution: . | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| Differentiate four times, using and its derivative, and evaluate at to get . Dividing by the factorials gives the stated series. Independent check by reciprocal series: . | ||
| 2 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| Substitute into the exponential series: contributes , contributes and contributes , so the cubic terms cancel exactly. Independent check by differentiation: with , , and , giving . | ||
| 3 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| Multiply the two standard series and collect powers: the contributions are and , giving . Independent check by Taylor's theorem: with , , , so , and so ; the coefficients are , and . | ||
| 4 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| Differentiating twice gives and , so the quadratic coefficient is . Substituting gives . Independent check: squaring, , and the true value exceeds the estimate by , which matches the neglected cubic term . | ||
| 5 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| The derivatives of cycle as , giving values at , so the coefficients are and . Independent check: with , , which reproduces the series and shows directly that only even powers of can occur. | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 3 |
| (3 marks) | 3 | |
| Notes | ||
| Substitute , so the numerator is and the quotient tends to . Independent check numerically: at the quotient is . | ||
| 2 |
| 3 |
| (3 marks) | 3 | |
| Notes | ||
| Put into ; the constant terms cancel and the leading surviving term is . Independent check numerically: at the quotient is . | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 3 |
| (3 marks) | 3 | |
| Notes | ||
| Use , so the terms cancel and the leading term of the numerator is . Independent check numerically: at the quotient is . | ||
| 2 |
| 4 |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| Subtract the two expansions: the linear terms cancel and the cubic coefficients add as . Independent check by factorising: , and numerically at the quotient is . | ||
| 3 |
| 4 |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| Expand both terms to order ; the terms cancel and the cubic coefficients are and , giving . Independent check numerically: at the quotient is . | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| The first two terms of the logarithm series are removed by the added polynomial, leaving as the leading behaviour. Independent check numerically: at the quotient is , consistent with . | ||
| 2 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| Both expansions agree up to , so the quartic terms decide the limit: . Independent check numerically: at the quotient is , approaching as . | ||
| 3 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| Square the sine series to get , factor out and use the binomial expansion of with ; the singular parts cancel and the constant term remains. Independent check numerically: at the expression equals . | ||
| 4 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| Write , expand the exponent as , and then expand the exponential about : . Independent check numerically: at the quotient is , against . | ||
| 5 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| Expand to order : and . For the quotient to be finite the coefficient of must vanish, giving ; equating the cubic coefficient to gives . Substituting gives , so and . Independent check numerically with these values at : the quotient is . | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 3 |
| (3 marks) | 3 | |
| Notes | ||
| Since has and , the sum has two terms. The fourth derivative of is and the third is , so the answer is . Independent check by direct differentiation: successive derivatives are , , , . | ||
| 2 |
| 4 |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| With , , and contributes only . The four terms are , , and , all multiplied by , giving . Independent check: substituting into gives , so the value is , which matches a numerical fourth difference of the function near . | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 4 |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| Every derivative of is itself, so the sum is . Independent check at : the formula gives , which agrees with the worked example obtained by direct differentiation. | ||
| 2 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| The derivatives of cycle with period four, so the sixth is , the fifth is and the fourth is . With and the terms are , and . Independent check numerically at : the expression gives , matching a sixth-order finite difference of at . | ||
| 3 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| Take and , so only contribute. The terms are , , and , that is over , summing to . Independent check: has , whose next two derivatives are and . | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| The sum is , and . Independent check: putting recovers , and putting , gives , which is the direct second derivative of . | ||
| 2 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| Apply Leibnitz with and ; only contribute, giving three terms in . Taking out the common factor leaves a quadratic in that simplifies to the constant . Independent check at : the formula gives , and differentiating three times gives , then , then . | ||
| 3 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| From we get ; differentiating and dividing by gives . Applying Leibnitz times to each product uses only the first three derivatives of and the first two of . Collecting terms gives and . Independent check at with : and , and substituting into gives identically. | ||
| 4 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| The chain rule gives , hence . Differentiating the left side times by Leibnitz uses and , so only contribute; the right side becomes . Independent check at and : , , and differentiating once gives , so , consistent with the stated relation. | ||
| 5 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| Setting collapses the recurrence to . Starting from gives and , while makes every even derivative zero. Dividing by factorials gives and . Independent check by binomial integration: . | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 3 |
| (3 marks) | 3 | |
| Notes | ||
| Both numerator and denominator vanish at , so differentiate each once to get , which is continuous at with value . Independent check by series: . | ||
| 2 |
| 3 |
| (3 marks) | 3 | |
| Notes | ||
| Since and , differentiate to get , whose value at is . Independent check by series: putting gives . | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 4 |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| The product form is converted to a quotient by writing ; one application of the rule reduces it to , which tends to . Independent check numerically: at , , and at it is , decreasing in magnitude towards zero. | ||
| 2 |
| 4 |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| One application of the rule leaves after cancelling , and substituting gives . Independent check by algebra: , so the quotient is , which tends to . | ||
| 3 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| Two applications of the rule reduce the quotient to ; cancelling leaves , whose value at is . Independent check by series: and , so the ratio tends to . | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| The form must first be combined over ; two applications of the rule then give , which tends to . Independent check by series: the numerator is and the denominator is , so the ratio tends to . | ||
| 2 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| Take logarithms to convert the form into a quotient, apply the rule once, and simplify; the factors cancel, leaving , so . Independent check numerically: at , , against . | ||
| 3 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| The form is handled by logarithms: , which the rule shows tends to , so . Independent check numerically: , and raised to itself is . | ||
| 4 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| Write the difference over the common denominator ; the numerator differentiates to and the denominator to , and after cancelling one further application gives . Independent check by series: and , so the ratio tends to . | ||
| 5 |
| 4 |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| L'Hospital's Rule requires an indeterminate form; here both parts are continuous and non-zero at , so the limit is obtained by direct substitution and equals . Independent check numerically: at the quotient is , and at it is , confirming the limit rather than the that misapplying the rule would suggest. | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 4 |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| The from cancels against the one in and the twos cancel, leaving . Independent check by differentiation: . | ||
| 2 |
| 4 |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| The numerator cancels with the denominator of , leaving . Independent check by differentiation: . | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| After substitution the factors cancel and the integrand is , a standard arctangent form with . Independent check by differentiation: . | ||
| 2 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| The limits transform as and , and after cancelling the integrand is . Independent check numerically: evaluating the original integral by Simpson's rule with four strips on gives , against . | ||
| 3 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| After substitution the integrand is , whose antiderivative is ; the limits are and . Independent check numerically: , and a Simpson's rule estimate of the original integral with four strips gives . | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| After substitution the integrand is with limits and ; since , the value is . Independent check numerically: , and Simpson's rule with four strips on the original integral gives . | ||
| 2 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| Substituting and cancelling gives , which partial fractions turn into two logarithms. The deduction uses the t-formula identity proved from the same substitution. Independent check by differentiation: . | ||
| 3 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| The quadratic in is a perfect square, so the integral is elementary: . Independent check numerically: Simpson's rule with four strips on the original integral gives , against . | ||
| 4 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| Completing the square gives , a standard partial-fraction logarithm form. Independent check by differentiation: at the stated antiderivative has derivative and ; the same agreement holds at , where both equal , and at , where both equal . | ||
| 5 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| The substitution is a bijection only on ; crossing sends through infinity, so a single antiderivative in jumps by a constant there and a blind application loses that jump. Splitting at and taking the two improper -integrals separately restores the correct value. Independent check: , whereas naively evaluating between and gives , which is not even positive. | ||