1.
(4)
(Total for Question 1 is 4 marks)
2 specification points · notes, questions, answers and worked methods
Checked against Edexcel 9FM0 section FP1-6. Review basis: the qualification registry sourced from the Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Further Mathematics (9FM0) specification; registry verification recorded 17 July 2026.
Explanation
Worked example
Given and at , use the approximation with to estimate at .
Answer: .
Common mistakes
Exam tip
Write the rearranged recurrence on its own line before any arithmetic, then tabulate , and ; the method mark is for the recurrence.
1.
(4)
(Total for Question 1 is 4 marks)
2.
(5)
(Total for Question 2 is 5 marks)
1.
(5)
(Total for Question 1 is 5 marks)
2.
(5)
(Total for Question 2 is 5 marks)
3.
(5)
(Total for Question 3 is 5 marks)
1.
(6)
(Total for Question 1 is 6 marks)
2.
(7)
(Total for Question 2 is 7 marks)
3.
(6)
(Total for Question 3 is 6 marks)
4.
(7)
(Total for Question 4 is 7 marks)
5.
(7)
(Total for Question 5 is 7 marks)
Explanation
Worked example
Use Simpson's rule with four strips to estimate , giving your answer to decimal places.
Answer: .
Common mistakes
Exam tip
Tabulate , , and the coefficient in four columns and check that the coefficients sum to before multiplying.
1.
(4)
(Total for Question 1 is 4 marks)
2.
(5)
(Total for Question 2 is 5 marks)
1.
(5)
(Total for Question 1 is 5 marks)
2.
(6)
(Total for Question 2 is 6 marks)
3.
(4)
(Total for Question 3 is 4 marks)
1.
(5)
(Total for Question 1 is 5 marks)
2.
(7)
(Total for Question 2 is 7 marks)
3.
(8)
(Total for Question 3 is 8 marks)
4.
(5)
(Total for Question 4 is 5 marks)
5.
(4)
(Total for Question 5 is 4 marks)
Answers begin on a new printed page so the question pack can be completed without the solutions alongside it.
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| Rearrange the forward difference and step twice. Independent check against the exact solution : and , so the estimates are low, as expected from a first-order method. | ||
| 2 | 5 | |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| Apply the recurrence twice, keeping seven decimal places in the working. Independent check by halving the step to and taking four steps: the estimate becomes , closer to the fourth-order value , and both step-wise estimates fall short of it as expected for a first-order method on an increasing solution. | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| Apply the central difference at the middle point , where both neighbouring ordinates are involved, and rearrange for the unknown one. Independent check by the forward difference from : , and the central-difference value lies on the more accurate side of it. | ||
| 2 | 5 | |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| Rearrange the second-derivative formula to make the subject and substitute at . Independent check: the second derivative at is , so the sequence should be slightly concave, and has second difference exactly as the formula demands. | ||
| 3 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| The recurrence multiplies by at each step, giving . Independent check by the series: , so the forward difference has lost the quadratic term, an error of order per step as expected. | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| Two forward-difference steps with the squared term evaluated at the current value of . Independent check by the Taylor series method: , gives , so , and the step-wise estimate lies just below it, as a first-order method should. | ||
| 2 |
| 7 |
| (7 marks) | 7 | |
| Notes | ||
| Substitute both finite-difference approximations at the interior point , which leaves a single linear equation in the unknown . Independent check against the exact solution , which gives and , within of the estimate. | ||
| 3 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| Expanding both neighbouring values and adding cancels every odd derivative, leaving as the first surviving term. Independent check with at , : the formula gives , against the exact , an error of . | ||
| 4 |
| 7 |
| (7 marks) | 7 | |
| Notes | ||
| Four forward-difference steps using the left-hand ordinate at each stage. Because the integrand is decreasing, using its value at the left of each interval overestimates the area, so the estimate exceeds . Independent check: the same calculation is the left-hand rectangle rule for , and the trapezium rule with the same ordinates gives , much closer to . | ||
| 5 |
| 7 |
| (7 marks) | 7 | |
| Notes | ||
| Rearranging the central difference gives , which involves three ordinates at once and so cannot start from a single value. Independent check of the order of accuracy: the central difference has error of order and the forward difference error of order , so at the ratio of errors should be roughly or more, consistent with the observed factor of about . | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 4 |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| Tabulate the five ordinates, apply the pattern and multiply by . Independent check with eight strips: the estimate becomes to four decimal places as well, confirming convergence. | ||
| 2 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| Apply the rule with and compare with the exact integral . Independent check of the fourth-order error: with eight strips the estimate is , about sixteen times closer, exactly as an error predicts. | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| The integrand has no elementary antiderivative, which is why a numerical method is required; apply the standard coefficient pattern. Independent check: the true value of this integral is , so Simpson's rule with only four strips is already accurate to five significant figures. | ||
| 2 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| Apply the rule with ; the relatively large strip width and the turning point of the integrand at make the error visible at the third decimal place. Independent check by substitution: gives . | ||
| 3 |
| 4 |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| Each parabolic arc covers two adjacent strips and shares its end ordinates with the neighbouring arcs, which is why an even number is needed. Independent check on the coefficients: they sum to with , the required total. | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| Evaluate the three ordinates of at , and , apply the rule and compare with the exact integral. Independent check of the general claim: the rule is exact for , and because it integrates the interpolating quadratic exactly, and the error term for a general function is proportional to the fourth derivative, which vanishes for every cubic. | ||
| 2 |
| 7 |
| (7 marks) | 7 | |
| Notes | ||
| Apply the rule with seven ordinates and the pattern. Independent check of the exact value: , and at this is , while at it is . | ||
| 3 |
| 8 |
| (8 marks) | 8 | |
| Notes | ||
| Apply the rule twice with and and compare each estimate with . Independent check of the theory: an error proportional to should shrink by when the strip width is halved, and the small shortfall from is the usual effect of the higher-order terms at these step sizes. | ||
| 4 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| Distance is the integral of speed with respect to time, so apply the rule to the tabulated ordinates with . Independent check by the trapezium rule on the same data: , slightly lower as expected for a concave speed-time graph. | ||
| 5 |
| 4 |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| The rule integrates a quadratic through each consecutive triple of ordinates, and each such quadratic covers exactly two strips, so an odd count cannot be partitioned. Independent check: with strips there are ordinates, of which carry coefficient and carry coefficient ; both counts are whole numbers only when is even. | ||