1.
(3)
(Total for Question 1 is 3 marks)
3 specification points · notes, questions, answers and worked methods
Checked against Edexcel 9MA0 section S4. Review basis: the qualification registry sourced from the Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Mathematics (9MA0) specification; registry verification recorded 11 July 2026.
Explanation
Worked example
Let . Find to decimal places.
Answer:
Common mistakes
Exam tip
Translate the inequality into the exact binomial range before using cumulative probabilities and round only at the end.
1.
(3)
(Total for Question 1 is 3 marks)
2.
(2)
(Total for Question 2 is 2 marks)
1.
(3)
(Total for Question 1 is 3 marks)
2.
(4)
(Total for Question 2 is 4 marks)
3.
(4)
(Total for Question 3 is 4 marks)
1.
(5)
(Total for Question 1 is 5 marks)
2.
(5)
(Total for Question 2 is 5 marks)
3.
(6)
(Total for Question 3 is 6 marks)
4.
(6)
(Total for Question 4 is 6 marks)
5.
(6)
(Total for Question 5 is 6 marks)
Explanation
Worked example
The lifetime of a component, in hours, is modelled by . Find the lifetime exceeded by exactly of components, to decimal place.
Answer: hours
Common mistakes
Exam tip
Convert an exceedance percentage to the corresponding lower-tail probability before standardising or using an inverse Normal calculation.
1.
(2)
(Total for Question 1 is 2 marks)
2.
(2)
(Total for Question 2 is 2 marks)
1.
(4)
(Total for Question 1 is 4 marks)
2.
(4)
(Total for Question 2 is 4 marks)
3.
(5)
(Total for Question 3 is 5 marks)
1.
(5)
(Total for Question 1 is 5 marks)
2.
(6)
(Total for Question 2 is 6 marks)
3.
(7)
(Total for Question 3 is 7 marks)
4.
(7)
(Total for Question 4 is 7 marks)
5.
(7)
(Total for Question 5 is 7 marks)
Explanation
Worked example
The masses of loaves from a stable production line form a roughly symmetric, single-peaked histogram with no clear outliers. Explain why a Normal model may be suitable and why a binomial model is not.
Answer: Mass is continuous and the observed distribution is approximately symmetric and unimodal, supporting a Normal model.; A binomial model counts successes in a fixed number of two-outcome trials, so it does not model individual loaf masses.
Common mistakes
Exam tip
Justify a model using the variable type, distribution shape and process assumptions, and name any condition that may fail.
1.
(2)
(Total for Question 1 is 2 marks)
2.
(2)
(Total for Question 2 is 2 marks)
1.
(3)
(Total for Question 1 is 3 marks)
2.
(4)
(Total for Question 2 is 4 marks)
3.
(4)
(Total for Question 3 is 4 marks)
1.
(5)
(Total for Question 1 is 5 marks)
2.
(5)
(Total for Question 2 is 5 marks)
3.
(5)
(Total for Question 3 is 5 marks)
4.
(6)
(Total for Question 4 is 6 marks)
5.
(5)
(Total for Question 5 is 5 marks)
Answers begin on a new printed page so the question pack can be completed without the solutions alongside it.
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 3 |
| (3 marks) | 3 | |
| Notes | ||
| Probabilities sum to , so and . Therefore . | ||
| 2 | 2 | |
| (2 marks) | 2 | |
| Notes | ||
| The positive values are and , giving . The values satisfying are and , giving . | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 3 |
| (3 marks) | 3 | |
| Notes | ||
| There are five equally likely values, so each has probability . The event contains , giving . The event contains and , giving . | ||
| 2 |
| 4 |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| For trials, . The requirement is , so . The smallest integer is , and . | ||
| 3 | 4 | |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| For the inclusive lower endpoint, subtract only values up to : . For the strict lower endpoint, subtract values up to : . Rounding gives and . | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| For , . Hence , so . Then , giving . | ||
| 2 | 5 | |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| Since implies , the required conditional probability is . Now and . Their ratio is , giving . | ||
| 3 | 6 | |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| For , and . Since , division gives , so and . Therefore . | ||
| 4 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| Write . The first ratio gives . Also , so . Subtracting gives , hence and then . Therefore . | ||
| 5 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| The two independent counts have the same success probability, so pooling their trials gives . Thus . Different machine probabilities would violate the constant- condition even if all component outcomes remained independent. | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| (2 marks) | 2 | |
| Notes | ||
| Standardise: . Therefore , which is . | ||
| 2 |
| 2 |
| (2 marks) | 2 | |
| Notes | ||
| A Normal density has points of inflection at and . Here these are and . | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| Standardising gives and . Hence . | ||
| 2 |
| 4 |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| Standardising the tenth percentile gives . Hence , so , which is to significant figures. | ||
| 3 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| Standardising the two percentiles gives and . Adding the equations, or using symmetry, gives . Then , so , giving to significant figures. | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| Use . The continuity correction gives . Thus , so the upper-tail probability is . | ||
| 2 | 6 | |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| By symmetry, , so and . Since implies , the conditional probability is . The corresponding standardised values are and , giving tail probabilities and . Their ratio is , giving . | ||
| 3 |
| 7 |
| (7 marks) | 7 | |
| Notes | ||
| The inflection points are and , so their midpoint gives and half their separation gives . The acceptance bounds standardise to and , hence the acceptance probability is . The expected rejected count is , giving . Within the acceptance interval, exceeding means ; the lower standardised value is . Thus the conditional probability is . | ||
| 4 |
| 7 |
| (7 marks) | 7 | |
| Notes | ||
| Equal opposite-tail probabilities in a Normal distribution place the mean halfway between and , so . The interval is therefore . Its central probability is , leaving in each tail, so and . The points of inflection are and . The probability between them is , so the histogram area represents an estimated frequency , giving to the nearest whole number. Agreement over only this interval is not a complete model check. | ||
| 5 |
| 7 |
| (7 marks) | 7 | |
| Notes | ||
| Standardising gives and . Subtraction gives , so and . Therefore . | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| (2 marks) | 2 | |
| Notes | ||
| There are fixed, independent trials, each switch is faulty or not faulty, and the fault probability is constant at . Therefore a binomial model with and is suitable. | ||
| 2 |
| 2 |
| (2 marks) | 2 | |
| Notes | ||
| Compare both the observed shape and the possible values with the features of a Normal distribution. The mismatch in symmetry and support makes the model doubtful. | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 3 |
| (3 marks) | 3 | |
| Notes | ||
| A binomial model requires a fixed success probability and independent trials. Removing of only components changes the composition appreciably, so these conditions fail. If the batch contains a known fixed number of defectives, the exact count distribution is hypergeometric; a probability tree with updated proportions is equivalent. Binomial can approximate sampling without replacement only when the sampling fraction is small, unlike the fraction here. | ||
| 2 |
| 4 |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| A binomial model requires independent trials with one constant probability of success. The stated fatigue mechanism violates the constant-probability condition and may introduce dependence. A refined model should allow the probability to change with shot number or fatigue stage. | ||
| 3 |
| 4 |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| Match the count to the binomial trial conditions: fixed selections, spam or not spam, independence and constant probability . The time variable is measured on a continuous scale, and its stated empirical shape matches the main features of a Normal density, so a Normal model is plausible rather than guaranteed. | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| Although the number of pixels is fixed and each pixel is defective or not, two essential binomial assumptions fail. Neighbouring outcomes are dependent and different shifts have different probabilities. Both mechanisms create extra variation relative to a single binomial distribution, so compare separate-shift data and observed counts with candidate models rather than forcing one common . | ||
| 2 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| Match each candidate distribution to both the variable type and its generating process. The binomial trial structure is absent, while the Normal shape and support conflict with the data. Stratifying comparable hours and validating predicted against observed frequencies provides evidence for a replacement rather than choosing one only by name. | ||
| 3 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| A mixture of two groups can be bimodal even when each group is individually close to Normal. One fitted Normal would place too much probability between the peaks and misrepresent both groups. Stratifying by the known treatment variable addresses the generating mechanism; the shape, support, independence and predictive fit of each proposed group model must still be checked. | ||
| 4 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| The fixed number of independent two-outcome trials with constant gives the exact binomial model. Its mean and variance are and , and both expected outcome counts are large. Applying continuity correction gives standardised bounds and , so the estimate is . | ||
| 5 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| Standardising zero gives , so the lower-tail probability is . Multiplying by gives , which rounds to . Model selection must consider possible values as well as centre and spread, and should be validated against observed data rather than chosen from parameters alone. | ||