1.
(2)
(Total for Question 1 is 2 marks)
3 specification points · notes, questions, answers and worked methods
Checked against Edexcel 9MA0 section S3. Review basis: the qualification registry sourced from the Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Mathematics (9MA0) specification; registry verification recorded 11 July 2026.
Explanation
Worked example
Events and are independent. Given and , find and .
Answer: .; .
Common mistakes
Exam tip
State whether the events are independent or mutually exclusive before choosing the intersection and union formulae.
1.
(2)
(Total for Question 1 is 2 marks)
2.
(2)
(Total for Question 2 is 2 marks)
1.
(3)
(Total for Question 1 is 3 marks)
2.
(4)
(Total for Question 2 is 4 marks)
3.
(4)
(Total for Question 3 is 4 marks)
1.
(5)
(Total for Question 1 is 5 marks)
2.
(5)
(Total for Question 2 is 5 marks)
3.
(6)
(Total for Question 3 is 6 marks)
4.
(6)
(Total for Question 4 is 6 marks)
5.
(5)
(Total for Question 5 is 5 marks)
Explanation
Worked example
A bag contains amber counters and blue counters. Two counters are taken without replacement. Find the probability that exactly one counter of each colour is taken.
Answer:
Common mistakes
Exam tip
Label every branch with the conditional probability after the first outcome, then add the required disjoint paths.
1.
(2)
(Total for Question 1 is 2 marks)
2.
(2)
(Total for Question 2 is 2 marks)
1.
(4)
(Total for Question 1 is 4 marks)
2.
(4)
(Total for Question 2 is 4 marks)
3.
(4)
(Total for Question 3 is 4 marks)
1.
(5)
(Total for Question 1 is 5 marks)
2.
(5)
(Total for Question 2 is 5 marks)
3.
(5)
(Total for Question 3 is 5 marks)
4.
(5)
(Total for Question 4 is 5 marks)
5.
(6)
(Total for Question 5 is 6 marks)
Explanation
Worked example
A factory model treats defects in two items from the same batch as independent, each with probability . It therefore predicts probability that both are defective. Explain how batch-to-batch variation is likely to affect this prediction.
Answer: Items from the same poor-quality batch are positively associated rather than independent.; Therefore two defects together are likely to occur more often than the modelled probability .
Common mistakes
Exam tip
Critique a probability model by naming the dependence mechanism and stating the likely direction of bias.
1.
(2)
(Total for Question 1 is 2 marks)
2.
(2)
(Total for Question 2 is 2 marks)
1.
(3)
(Total for Question 1 is 3 marks)
2.
(3)
(Total for Question 2 is 3 marks)
3.
(4)
(Total for Question 3 is 4 marks)
1.
(5)
(Total for Question 1 is 5 marks)
2.
(5)
(Total for Question 2 is 5 marks)
3.
(6)
(Total for Question 3 is 6 marks)
4.
(6)
(Total for Question 4 is 6 marks)
5.
(6)
(Total for Question 5 is 6 marks)
Answers begin on a new printed page so the question pack can be completed without the solutions alongside it.
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| (2 marks) | 2 | |
| Notes | ||
| Mutually exclusive events have no overlap, so . | ||
| 2 |
| 2 |
| (2 marks) | 2 | |
| Notes | ||
| Independence requires the intersection probability to equal the product , which it does. Mutual exclusivity requires a zero intersection, which it does not have. | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 3 |
| (3 marks) | 3 | |
| Notes | ||
| Mutual exclusivity gives , so . Independence would require . Since , the events are not independent. | ||
| 2 |
| 4 |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| Split according to : . If and were independent, would equal , but . Therefore they are not independent. | ||
| 3 |
| 4 |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| Independence gives . Therefore . Also , proving independence. The complement of is , so . | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| . Since is uniform, . The variables are independent, so . Therefore . | ||
| 2 | 5 | |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| Let , so and independence gives . The union formula gives , hence . Therefore . The plus sign gives , so . Substituting into , or using , gives . | ||
| 3 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| Each event contains two of the four equally likely outcomes. Every pair intersects only in , so each pair has intersection probability . The intersection of all three events is also and has probability , whereas mutual independence would require . Pairwise checks alone therefore do not establish mutual independence. | ||
| 4 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| , and . Independence requires , giving . Both roots make every listed probability non-negative. The union probability is . The positive intersection rules out mutual exclusivity. | ||
| 5 | 5 | |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| The uniform interval has length . For , , and . Independence gives , so and . Then , and , hence . | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| (2 marks) | 2 | |
| Notes | ||
| The condition restricts the denominator to the bus travellers. Of these, arrived before , so the probability is . | ||
| 2 | 2 | |
| (2 marks) | 2 | |
| Notes | ||
| Use the conditional probability formula: . | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| Among the Physics students, also study Mathematics, so . The number studying at least one subject is , leaving studying neither. Thus . | ||
| 2 | 4 | |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| . Reversing the condition changes the denominator: . | ||
| 3 | 4 | |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| The joint probabilities are and . Hence . Restricting the sample space to defective components gives . | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| From the conditional probability formula, . Hence , so . Also . Therefore . | ||
| 2 | 5 | |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| . Since , . Total probability gives , so . Finally . | ||
| 3 | 5 | |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| For box A, , so . For box B, , so . Therefore , and . | ||
| 4 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| The margins give the remaining cells by subtraction, and the neither cell is . Independence requires , so . There are people in , of whom are also in , giving . | ||
| 5 | 6 | |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| Total probability gives , so . The joint probability of being standard and not renewing is , while , so the conditional probability is . For two independently selected customers, exactly one renewal has probability . | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 2 |
| (2 marks) | 2 | |
| Notes | ||
| Equal probabilities require a fair randomising process. Any systematic difference in ticket placement, shape or handling would undermine that assumption. | ||
| 2 |
| 2 |
| (2 marks) | 2 | |
| Notes | ||
| Without replacement, the first outcome changes both the number of prizes and the total number of entries available. The second-trial probability is therefore conditional on the first outcome. | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 3 |
| (3 marks) | 3 | |
| Notes | ||
| A dry day has probability , so independence gives . In reality, pressure systems can make one day's weather informative about the next. A transition model could use separate probabilities of rain following a wet day and following a dry day. | ||
| 2 |
| 3 |
| (3 marks) | 3 | |
| Notes | ||
| The prediction relies on one stable probability and independent outcomes. A shared closure affects many parcels simultaneously, so both assumptions are doubtful. A condition-dependent model can separate ordinary days from disruption days. | ||
| 3 |
| 4 |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| Equal sector angles are only one part of the random mechanism: friction, balance and how the spinner is released can alter outcome probabilities. Validation therefore needs repeated observations of all four outcomes under controlled conditions. Relative frequencies close to provide evidence that the model is useful in those conditions, but sampling variation and untested conditions prevent a claim of proof. | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| Under the model, . A route-B closure is a common cause affecting all five choices, so the choices are not independent on that day. It makes simultaneous choices of route A more likely, so a model including road conditions would usually give a larger probability for this event. | ||
| 2 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| First average over weather: . Squaring gives only if crossings are independent. With one weather state shared by both crossings, condition first: . The larger value shows the effect of positive association from the common condition. | ||
| 3 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| Compare the fixed model probability with the supplied subgroup results rather than averaging them immediately. The increasing proportions across night loading and longer routes suggest structured lack of fit rather than merely random disagreement around one common value. Pooling can mask that structure when the group mix changes. A condition-dependent model should be fitted using one data set and tested on fresh data for the same four groups, because rechecking only the fitting data would give weak validation. | ||
| 4 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| The replacement-style model gives complement . Without replacement, the probability that all four selected animals are non-carriers is . Its complement is . Removing non-carriers while following the no-carrier path makes a later carrier increasingly likely, so the independent calculation is too small. | ||
| 5 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| Under one constant probability, multiply four factors of . Under the refined specification, multiply the four different conditional success probabilities. Their difference is . Evidence for fatigue requires replicated ordered attempts, not just an overall average, and validation should compare predictions with new sequences. | ||