1.
(4)
(Total for Question 1 is 4 marks)
1 specification points · notes, questions, answers and worked methods
Checked against Edexcel 9FM0 section FS1-8. Review basis: the qualification registry sourced from the Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Advanced GCE in Further Mathematics (9FM0) specification; registry verification recorded 17 July 2026.
Explanation
Worked example
For , a test rejects when . Find the size, write the power function and express the Type II error probability at .
Answer: Size to significant figures; power is the stated upper-tail sum, and Type II probability at is .
Common mistakes
Exam tip
Use the same critical-region event for size and power; only the parameter value in its probability changes.
1.
(4)
(Total for Question 1 is 4 marks)
2.
(2)
(Total for Question 2 is 2 marks)
1.
(6)
(Total for Question 1 is 6 marks)
2.
(5)
(Total for Question 2 is 5 marks)
3.
(6)
(Total for Question 3 is 6 marks)
1.
(9)
(Total for Question 1 is 9 marks)
2.
(7)
(Total for Question 2 is 7 marks)
3.
(9)
(Total for Question 3 is 9 marks)
4.
(7)
(Total for Question 4 is 7 marks)
5.
(7)
(Total for Question 5 is 7 marks)
Answers begin on a new printed page so the question pack can be completed without the solutions alongside it.
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 4 |
| (4 marks) | 4 | |
| Notes | ||
| Translate the two decision errors using the null value and the direction of the alternative. The size is the probability of the Type I error evaluated at the null parameter. | ||
| 2 |
| 2 |
| (2 marks) | 2 | |
| Notes | ||
| The size is the null probability of the critical region. Since , . | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| The size is . At , power is . The Type II probability is its complement, . | ||
| 2 |
| 5 |
| (5 marks) | 5 | |
| Notes | ||
| For an upper-tail rule, test adjacent thresholds. Under , , which exceeds , while , so the critical region is . Its size is to significant figures. At , the power is to decimal places. | ||
| 3 |
| 6 |
| (6 marks) | 6 | |
| Notes | ||
| The size is the null probability of the given critical region: to decimal places. At a general parameter value the same rejection event gives . Hence to decimal places. The Type II probability at is to decimal places. Since , the test has size below . | ||
| Question | Scheme | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 9 |
| (9 marks) | 9 | |
| Notes | ||
| The power function is the critical-region probability at a general . At the null value, , which is the size. At , the power is to decimal places, so the Type II probability is to decimal places. Using the unrounded power, the expected number rejected across repetitions is . Since , the test does not have size at most . | ||
| 2 |
| 7 |
| (7 marks) | 7 | |
| Notes | ||
| At , and , so both control size below . Direct binomial sums give and ; by symmetry , while . The rounded values are respectively , , and . Region is preferable for upper departures because its power at is much higher, although its asymmetry sacrifices lower-tail power. | ||
| 3 |
| 9 |
| (9 marks) | 9 | |
| Notes | ||
| The Type I probability is . At the stated actual value , a Type II error is . If , set ; then and . Comparing upper tails from the same distribution, which are strictly decreasing in their integer threshold, equality occurs when , giving . Direct summation gives . Symmetry gives the same exact value for . Thus the size is , which exceeds , and the power at is . | ||
| 4 |
| 7 |
| (7 marks) | 7 | |
| Notes | ||
| The rejection event occurs exactly when the first seven inspected components are not defective. At a general value of its probability is therefore , which proves that . Under , the size is . At the stated alternative value, the power is , so the Type II error probability is . An observed value of lies in the critical region, so reject ; in context, there is sufficient evidence that the probability that a component is defective is below . | ||
| 5 |
| 7 |
| (7 marks) | 7 | |
| Notes | ||
| Direct binomial tails under give sizes and , both below . Expanding the rejection probabilities gives and . At , the binomial coefficients give and . Since , Test B has the greater probability of detecting this stated alternative. | ||